| Thursday, 14th March 2002 | |
| 15.00-16.30 | Registration |
| 16.30-17.00 | Hans Kordy (Center for Psychotherapy Research, Stuttgart, D), Michael Lambert (Brigham Young University, Provo, USA) Welcome and program overview. |
| 17.00-18.00 | Key not speaker (???) Bridging Science and Practice: new research objectives and methodology. |
| 18.00 | Reception |
Friday, 15th March 2002 |
|
| 09.00-10.30 | Quality assurance in clinical practice: Learning from examples in specific service areas. |
| U. Koch, S. Lecher, D. Schulz (University of Hamburg, D) Quality assurance in psychosomatic rehabilitation. Robert Lueger (Marquette University, Milwaukee, USA), Zoran Martinovich (Northwestern University, Evanston, USA) Using the COMPASS Treatment Assessment System for psychotherapy provision under the conditions of managed care. Frank Margison et al. (Manchester, GB) Managing care provision for patients with mental disorders under NHS conditions. |
|
| 10.30-11.00 | Coffee Break |
| 11.00-12.30 | Outcome monitoring for specific disorders |
| Martin Härter (University of Freiburg) Quality assurance initiatives in psychiatric and psychotherapeutic care for depression: experiences from the South German QA project and the German Competence Network on Depression. J. Pellet et al. (University St. Etienne, F) Monitoring the quality of care for schizophrenic patients. P. Machado et al. (Universidade do Minho, Braga, P) Monitoring the quality of care provision for eating disorders in Northern Portugal |
|
| 12.30-14.00 | Lunch Break |
| 14.00-15.30 | Laying the base for a benchmark of quality: Concepts and tools to detect shortcomings in psychotherapy delivery (post-treatment): |
| W. Wittmann et al. (University of Mannheim, D) A multi-aspect approach to the evaluation of treatment quality in psychosomatic treatment. Jeb Brown (Center for Clinical Informatics, Salt Lake City, USA) Using the ALERT system for establishing quality benchmarks in a managed care setting Mark Aveline et al. (University of Nottingham, GB) Using the CORE (Clinical Outcome R Evaluation) to identify poor treatment outcome. |
|
| 15.30-16.00 | Coffee Break |
| 16.00-17.30 | Outcome monitoring in ongoing treatment: Concepts and tools to detect non-responders to psychotherapy. |
| Robert Percevic et al. (Center for Psychotherapy Research Stuttgart, D) Adaptive prognostic models: Learning by continuous monitoring. Jon Monsen et al. (Oslo University, N) Looking at patterns of change to identify non-responders. Gary Burlingame et al. (Brigham Young University, Provo, USA) Using deviations from expected course adjusted for initial status as indicators of non-response in children and adolescents. |
|
| 18.00-19.30 | Internet-Chat discussion with external participants |
Saturday, 16th March 2002 |
|
| 09.00-11.00 | Quality of psychotherapy service from various perspectives. |
| Else Guthrie et al. (Manchester, GB) Psychotherapy costs, but pays off: report from a new British study. Bernd Puschner et al. (Center for Psychotherapy Research Stuttgart, D) The relationship between psychotherapy outcome, psychotherapy costs, and general health costs. Simone de la Rie, Liesbeth Libbers, Greta Noordenbos, Eric van Furth (Robert-Fleury-Stichting, Leidschendam, NL The consumer perspective on quality of care. N.N. (health insurance) Quality and costs of psychotherapy services: purchaser's perspective |
|
| 11.00-11.30 | Coffee Break |
| 11.30-13.00 | How to make use of outcome monitoring: The effect of information feedback on treatment and outcome. |
| Michael Lambert et al. (Brigham Young University, Provo, USA) The effect of feeding back information on response and non-response to therapists. Stephanie Bauer et al. (Center for Psychotherapy Research Stuttgart, D) Information feedback in inpatient psychotherapy: How is it received by the clinical team and what does it effect? Janet Treasure (Maudsley Hospital London, GB) Giving feedback on improvement to patients: What does this mean for treatment and outcome? |
|
| 13.00-14.30 | Lunch |
| 14.30-16.00 | From outcome monitoring to outcome management. |
| James Mitchell et al. (University of North Dakota, Fargo, USA) The provision of treatment for patients with eating disorders who do not respond to standard treatment: Adjust treatment, treatment goals, and criteria for outcome monitoring? V. Golkaramnay et al. (Center for Psychotherapy Research Stuttgart, D) Bridging inpatient treatment and outpatient maintenance treatment: Can outcome monitoring guide transitions? Marion Olmstedt et al. (Toronto General Hospital, Can) The use of outcome monitoring in step-wise care programs. |
|
| 16.00-16.30 | Coffee Break |
| 16.30-18.00 | Concluding discussion including participants via Internet-Chat |
| 20.00 | Conference Dinner |